Report Abuse

[Q=marks1499] Perhaps the primary discussion should be a civil action to rescind Diamond ownership's/contracts. Sufficient corporate malfeasance has occurred and continues to occur to provide credible grounds. Any interest by a competent attorney to provide contingency representation will be contingent on organization by individuals expressing their unfortunate turn of events on this site. If refunds of purchase monies can be achieved hard to see how that can be viewed as overreaching. What the attorney's make at that point becomes irrelevant.[/Q] Well said Mark. It is a myth that the only way out of a DRI contract is a surrender. The average individual has sufficient grounds to get out with a refund. And certainly, if people would work together, there are grounds for a class action. I think the class has to insist on full transparency with any law firm that represents them. There have been some big class actions that were plagued with corruption. I think any honest firm would be anxious to reassure the clients by making all records accessible to them.